here


Welcome to the WWW home of...

 

Home Leona's Journal Missions Teaching Seminars Bible Studies Devotions Writings Books Published Memories Recipes Contact Me

 

~ Click here to read the thesis in its entirety. ~

 

 

 

 

 

 

[top]

Thesis

 

Bethlehem University: A Case Study in the Development of
Higher Education in the Midst of Political Struggle
©

Jerusalem University College, Department of Middle Eastern Studies, Israel, 1999

 

by

Leona England Karni, M.A.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 

 

 

SUMMARY
(only)

The topic of this thesis is Bethlehem University: A Case Study in the Development of Higher Education in the Midst of Political Struggle. There are three major factors involved in the development of Bethlehem University, three distinct phases in that development, and numerous contributions that the university has made in the development of Palestinian society. The three major factors in the development of Bethlehem University are: the political situation, which involved the Israeli military; the administration, who were American Brothers from the LaSalle Brothers Order; and the students, who were Palestinians.

First the political situation. From 1967, when Israel occupied the West Bank, until 1987 at the time of the Intifada, the Israeli authorities had issued over 1200 military orders which controlled every aspect of daily life on the West Bank. Of these military orders, MO 39, MO 50, MO 101 and MO 854 had a significant effect on the development of higher education. Military Order 39 (July 1967) was the first step in restructuring the judicial system and was designed to separate the West Bank from both Jordan and Israel and to bring it under the control of the military administration. Military Order 50 (July 1967) was first concerned with the censorship of newspapers but was extended to include all printed material including carving in stone.

Under Military Order 101 (August 1967), without the permission of the Military Commander, it was forbidden to conduct a protest march or meeting, to congregate in a group of 10 or more where the subject concerned or was related to politics. It was also forbidden to raise flags or other symbols, to distribute or publish a political article, or pictures with political connotations. It was further forbidden to make any attempt to influence public opinion in a way that would be detrimental to public order and security. These censorship regulations were in accordance with the Defense Regulations (Emergency) 1945. These emergency regulations were enacted by England during the Mandate in the 1930s because of the Arab Revolt, and again in 1945 prior to the war of partition. They were revoked by the King of England in April 1948 and were never in force under Jordanian law. The punishment for non-compliance to these military orders was a prison sentence up to 10 years and/or a fine. Soldiers were given the authority to use force to enforce this law.

Military Order 854 was an amendment to Jordanian Law of Education Number 16, which was a law concerning elementary and secondary education. MO854 replaced the phrase "Jordanian Ministry of Education" with the phrase "Officer in the Israeli Military in Charge of Education," and extended it to include "institutes of learning," which in effect brought higher education under military control. These four military orders had a significant impact on the development of higher education on the West Bank.

The second factor in the development of Bethlehem University was the administration. Bethlehem University was sponsored by the Vatican and founded and developed by the Christian Brothers, also known as the LaSalle Brothers. The Brothers who were commissioned for this task were Americans. As Americans they placed a high value on the individual. This was a cultural distinction that conflicted with the cultural norms of the Palestinians. The goals of the administration were to remain neutral in politics, to establish and maintain the academic process. They further intended to train leaders for a new Palestinian society and to develop in response to the needs of the community. The military orders, and at times the students themselves, presented a great challenge to the administration in their efforts to meet these goals.

The third factor for consideration is the students, who of course were Palestinians. As Palestinians they had a high regard for education. This was evidenced in the Mandate period when the Palestinians paid over fifty percent of the cost to increase village schools from 171 to 504 in number. In the Arab world today Palestinians have the highest enrollment in schools and are the highest educated. Relative to their population Palestinians are one of the highest, possibly the third highest educated in the world.

As committed as the students were to education, they were equally committed to the struggle for national identity, the early stirrings of which date back to the Balfour Declaration. In fact the students did not view the national struggle and education as separate but considered them as one and the same. The Student Senate and the Palestinian community in general expected the universities to propagate Palestinian culture and train future leaders for an independent Palestinian state.

From the onset there existed within these three groups—the Israeli military, the administration and the students—a distinct difference in their perception of the role of Bethlehem University in the occupied West Bank. The Israelis viewed the universities on the West Bank as hotbeds for terrorism and a threat to security. The administration viewed Bethlehem University as being neutral in politics, with the primary purpose of providing an educational opportunity for the future leaders of a new Palestine. The students viewed the universities as being the first Palestinian national institutions and as such they were expected to be very much a part of the national struggle. The differences in perception between these three groups had a considerable impact during the various phases of the university's development. The three phases of development are the early years (from 1973 until 1987), the years of closure (from 1987 until 1990), and the years of transition (from 1991 until 1998).

From the first semester following the opening of Bethlehem University, the differences between the administration, students and the Israeli military became apparent. The university opened October 1, 1973, and on October 6 the Yom Kippur War broke out. The Israeli military placed roadblocks throughout the West Bank as a security measure. One of the consequences of this security measure was that the students and staff had limited access to the university campus, so that within the first week of the opening there was an interruption of the academic process. On November 30, less than two months after the opening, anti-Zionist literature was thrown into the classrooms from the outside courtyard. Following this incident a student came to the administration and demanded to know what action would be taken. This student, as well as several other students, had been imprisoned by the Israelis and they were concerned that when the Israeli authorities found out about the incident, they would again be arrested. Brother Brendan, the Vice President of the university, having little experience with the political situation on the West Bank and coming from a society where there was a high value placed on the individual, reported the incident to the Bethlehem Police Department.

After Brother Brendan returned to the campus the students stared at him with hatred and refused to speak to him. In the students’ opinion it was seriously wrong to go to the police and Brother Brendan was viewed as being on the side of the enemy. The students, who placed a higher value on the community than on the individual, would have preferred that the few students who had been previously imprisoned be left to take their chances rather than place all the students in jeopardy.

The Student Senate of Bethlehem University was very active and was involved in organizing demonstrations, assemblies and Palestinian cultural events on campus. The Israeli authorities were aware that the PLO was the guiding force behind the student demonstrations and disturbances and that they were using the Committee for National Guidance to engineer these activities. The goal of the CNG was to unify and consolidate the national community. According to the Israeli military orders these activities were outlawed and the military would use force to break up these events. In November of 1974 an organized peaceful demonstration on campus was raided. One student was shot, others were beaten and several were arrested. A consequence of these student activities was the closing of the university and an interruption of the academic process. The administration would need to schedule make-up classes which would extend the semesters by weeks and later by months, much to the distress of the students.

The arrests of students and faculty became common and the administration was unwillingly forced into the political conflict. The Brothers would attempt to visit those who were arrested. In addition they would contact various foreign dignitaries and consuls to inform them of the situation and to enlist their services. They would also visit the families of those arrested to pass on any information and to comfort them. The students were aware of the efforts the administration was making in these cases and slowly their attitude towards them began to change as they began to believe that they were there for them.

Military orders requiring censorship of printed material had a direct effect on the development of the Library. From 1980 no Arabic books or periodicals were allowed to enter the West Bank, and any material on Palestine was considered seditious and was therefore illegal. The development of new programs was often affected, as when the university was denied a request to add a Tour Guide class. The further development of the physical buildings on campus, such as the multi-purpose building, was halted by the denial of building permits. The authority of the Council of Higher Education was usurped by the Israeli authorities through MO854. Work permits for faculty were reduced from annual renewal to renewal every 15 days. University licenses were renewed through the military annually. Permits to travel from one district to another affected nursing students.

In November 1981 following demonstrations the university was closed for 18 days; after a Palestinian cultural event in 1983 universities were closed for two months. Often the military would state that the university was open but the campus was closed. Closing became a standard measure in response to student demonstrations and Palestinian cultural activities. The administration, who were committed to guard the integrity of the academic program, would reschedule classes and the semesters were extended far into the summer months. Unfortunately, the Student Senate activities were also directed against the administration in the form of student strikes. The students objected to the administration’s strict adherence to schedule make-up classes and wanted more control over the academic requirements and the campus.

By the 1980s these student activities had developed into a routine. There would be a meeting in the auditorium followed by singing national songs in courtyard, and placing a flag on pole at the entrance gate. Soldiers would arrive and surround the campus. In reaction to the soldiers, the students would throw stones. In reaction to the students throwing stones, the soldiers would fire canisters of tear gas and live ammunition onto the campus. During one of these routine demonstrations on campus in September 1987, a student was shot and killed. The military closed the university for three months. The three-month closure should have ended in December, but in December the Intifada broke out and the university remained closed for three years.

In December 1987 the Intifada broke out and all universities on the West Bank were closed. Israeli authorities held the universities responsible for inciting unrest. They had long believed that the universities were hotbeds for anti-Israeli propaganda and this led in their opinion to the necessity of closing them. According to Article 56 of the Hague Regulations, it was illegal to raid schools or to close them for prolonged periods of time. The administration considered this their legal basis to defy the Israeli military and do everything within their power to keep the academic process going.

The administration, faculty and staff at Bethlehem University united in an effort to keep the academic process going. The faculty restructured courses and the administration arranged for classes to meet at off-campus locations. These off-campus classes are also referred to as the Distance Learning Program and the Underground University. Bethlehem University continued to operate because the Brothers’ residence was on campus and the staff was allowed access to the campus. This made it possible for the library and secretarial staff to work in support of the off-campus classes. The Library staff organized the books the students would need and photocopied readings and texts.

Classes were held in homes, in basements, hotels, convents, outdoors and a variety of other locations. They were always under the threat of being raided by the military and the participants were in danger of being arrested. Students were not able to take more than two classes per semester. This political situation actually united the administration and the students in the national struggle. Each was defying the Israeli authorities to keep the academic process going.

Students in an Earth Science class used these adverse circumstances to their advantage by completing a thorough field mapping, sectioning and sampling of Wadi Ahmad. The Pre-School Teacher program took on a national scope and expanded as a result of the Intifada. The Nursing program and the Hotel Management program were able to continue in East Jerusalem. As a result of the increasing injuries sustained by the Palestinian youth, the university developed a physiotherapy program which was begun during the Intifada. Also during these years the university continued to offer workshops and training classes for in-service teachers and special courses for the staff. They were also able to continue research—the faculty continued to publish books and articles in academic journals.

The three-year closure of Bethlehem University served to remove the differences that existed between the administration and the students in that it united them in keeping the academic process going in defiance of the Israeli military. Each emerged from this period with a greater respect for one another and a bonding resulted from the intense experience.

The last phase of development begins with the re-opening of the university in 1990 and covers the arrival of the Palestinian National Authority and the 25-year anniversary celebration of Bethlehem University. Israel was under pressure from the European Parliament and the European Community to re-open the universities on the West Bank. They threatened to freeze funds allocated to scientific cooperation with Israel until the universities were re-opened. In response to this pressure, Israel announced in March 1990 the gradual re-opening of the universities on the West Bank. This did not reflect a change in Israel's perception of the universities and their attitude towards them. They were still considered a threat to security.

Following the re-opening of Bethlehem University the academic process was constantly disrupted. The military continued to close the universities without warning, allowing no time for adjustments or notices to be given. Roadblocks would be set up within a hundred meters of the entrance gates, preventing faculty and students from entering. During these years further interruptions were experienced as a result of the Gulf War and the sealing off of the West Bank by Israel in 1993.

This was a critical time for the university. The faculty was very discouraged, since it was impossible to plan with the expectation that the plans would be realized. For some programs, it was necessary for off-campus classes to continue to meet. In addition to the uncertainty caused by the political situation, the faculty had to put much more effort into the freshmen students to bring them up to a university level of performance, because education had suffered during these years of the Intifada.

In July of 1991 the 300 students who had completed their education through the Distance Learning Program received their degrees. The unspoken sentiment of each student, faculty member and administrative personnel was "we are still here and we are here to stay." In 1994 the universities of the West Bank came under the authority of the Palestinian National Authority (PNA). While sporadic closings continued, for the first time in 20 years Bethlehem University was able to move forward with their building projects and course development without military censorship. The university is an authorized official member of the Association of Palestinian Universities and as such they have a representative with the Ministry of Education. The Student Senate is still active on campus promoting cultural activities and protesting through demonstrations and student strikes. Under the PNA the campus is a free one, and these activities are not disturbed. The 25-year anniversary celebration of Bethlehem University was a joyous, victorious event. A new era had been ushered in, one in which there was cooperation and respect between the government, students and administration.

In conclusion, some of the contributions Bethlehem University has made to the development of Palestinian society will be considered. From its inception, Bethlehem University was committed to upgrading education on the West Bank. This commitment has borne results. The Pre-School Teacher program has revolutionized early education and the graduates of these programs are able to secure immediate employment. The SAT program (Subject Area Teachers), which was first developed by Bethlehem University, has focused on the intermediate level classes through training teachers for this specific group. These two programs, which specialize in a specific age group, have done much to improve the standard of education for the Palestinian community. The Faculty of Education also offers an Advanced Diploma in Education and maintains a center for workshops to upgrade active teachers.

All students at the university are required to take three semesters of English. The English department has offered and continues to offer classes to the community. The university has thus assisted the community in relating to the many non-government organizations which operate on the West Bank, and through these classes has prepared the participants with the skills of an international language. The Chemistry department founded the Water and Soil Environmental Research Unit which keeps an ongoing database on water quality in the West Bank and Gaza. It is available to the municipal authorities. Through the Nursing and Hotel Management programs graduates are able to secure immediate employment. The attitudes regarding these professions as being unsuitable for women have changed and this attitude change has helped improve the status of women within the Palestinian community.

The social interaction of the students through the university has helped them to understand their Palestinian identity, as students from villages all over the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem come together to discuss Palestinian issues and prepare themselves for a future in a new Palestinian society. They have the opportunity to clarify who they are and who they want to be within that new society. Many of the leaders in the Palestinian National Authority are graduates of Bethlehem University. As leaders of a new Palestine they are fulfilling one of the common goals of the administration and students.

The administration’s and the students’ high regard for education was the basis for the staying power needed to endure the political situation and their own differences. This high regard for education enabled them to press on to ensure that an easily accessible educational opportunity was available to high school graduates in Palestine.

Bethlehem University from its founding and through most of its development was formed and molded in large part through the political situation and the military occupation. After Oslo, the context in which the university has been evolving has changed. Since 1993 the West Bank has been experiencing a time of transition as the peace process which was begun at Oslo continues. As a result Bethlehem University has had an opportunity to continue to grow in a more normal environment. The university is now able to focus on improving the quality of education. Given the present relationship that Bethlehem University has with the Palestinian community, it has the opportunity to further develop community relationships and to be a part of the healing process. The university is able to provide a forum for dialogue with the various religious and political groups of the Palestinian and Israeli communities. Bethlehem University is able now to encourage a more open and free expression of ideas and hopes for the future, and to be a part of the date with democracy that awaits the new Palestine.

[back to top]

 

 

~ Click here to read the Thesis in its entirety. ~
 

 

 

• Home • Leona's Journal • Missions • Teaching Seminars • Bible Studies • Devotions • Writings • Books Published • Memories • Recipes • Contact Me •

 
 

Copyright © 2006-2014 by Leona Karni.  All rights reserved.